A Final Note to this Home Page

I shall end this home page with a quote from Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, she is my one of favorite mystic and philosophers.

Helena Blavatsky- Founder of Theosophical Society 

 

“One thing is certain, when a man shall have discovered the perpetual motion, he will be able to understand by analogy all the secrets of nature; progress in direct ratio with resistance.” Isis Unveiled, Volume 1, Page 502

 

Blavatsky’s above quote seems to be the reproduction of the original statement made by  French occult author and purported magician Eliphas Levi (1810-1875) in his book entitled: “Dogma et Rituel de la Haute Magie” Part I: The Doctrine of Transcendental Magic, translated by A. E. Waite

 

While describing “Tetragram”, on page 21, Elephas Levi states: “Imagine a watch having two parallel springs, with an engagement which makes them work in an opposite direction so that the one in unwinding winds up the other. In this way, the watch will wind up itself, and you will have discovered perpetual motion. The engagement should be at two ends and of extreme accuracy. Is this beyond attainment? We think not. But when it is discovered the inventor will understand by analogy all the secrets of Nature PROGRESS IN DIRECT PROPORTION TO RESISTANCE.

The absolute movement of life is thus the perpetual consequence of two contrary tendencies which are never opposed. When one seems to yield to the other, it is like a spring which is winding up, and you may expect a reaction, the moment and characteristics of which it is quite possible to foresee and determine.”

 

In his book "The Doctrine of Transcendental Magic" Eliphis Levi attributes symbol "Cheth" to find the Philosophical Stone", "Teth" to possess the universal medicine" and  "Yod" to know the laws of perpetual motion and prove the quadrature of the circle". "Kaph", "To change into gold, not only all metals, but also the Earth itself and even the refuse of the Earth".

Since perpetual motion is actual mechanics of the creative process in Nature, we may call it as the Prime Mechanism of the power creation. Matter, mind and life are non existent without perpetual motion. When we talk about creative potential of nature, it appears that fundamental principles which govern matter, mind and life are essentially same in all planes of existence. Perpetual motion is one of such principles that impart necessary power and stability to govern activities of matter, mind and life and their creative capabilities also. It is only the principle of perpetual motion by which these entities secure their existence, maintain their identity and sustain various processes even in adverse environment. On physical plane, though genuine inventors like Orffyreus, in the past, have demonstrated the principle of perpetual motion by devising a mechanism that would move any object forever without expenditure of force, in essence, on metaphysical plane, the principle is deeper than demonstration, deeper than definite cognition, deep as the very nature of the mind, soul or Brihma. It is direct manifestation of soul. Its authority transcends all other physical principles whatever, for not only is perpetual motion given in the constitution of our consciousness, but also it is impossible to imagine a consciousness so constituted as not to give it. Man is the activator of this creative principle and he sets the creative principle in motion by his thoughts. As he thinks so does he create. In essence, perpetual motion is creation from “nothingness” - the “formless void” of primordial matter, the “great deep” or “abyss” out of which the cosmos or order of the universe has come and evolved. Stars, planets, entire solar system which are born from nothingness grow, mature, become old and eventually die, giving way to other which follows the same course and ultimately vanish into nothingness. We were born from ‘nothingness’; we will merge into nothingness, entire universe sprung from ‘nothingness and in turn would dissolve into nothingness. “All from nothing”, “all from void” - the value of these assertions may be gauged from the fact that great mystics Christ, Buddha, Lao-tzu, Shankaracharya, Eckhart, Teilhard de Chardin, Aurobindo, Madame H. P. Blavatsky J.Krishnamurti, Osho and many other philosophers were cognizant of the principle. They have been fascinated by mystery of “nothingness” and rise of universe by inherent perpetual motion in it. They have taught to us that whatever is born will also be destroyed and whatever may be destroyed cannot be thought to be permanent. Hence everything is momentary everything exist only for a moment. Even our own self is the flow of consciousness. In the consciousness the present moment is the result of the past, and the future is the result of present. Thus, one moment succeeds another moment and the action and the memory of the past moments are transferred to the next moment. This perpetual flux which springs from “nothingness” goes on perpetually. Here I mean to say that philosophical basis of perpetual motion was well discovered by many great philosophers of ancient civilizations.

Lo Tzu is my other favorite mystic and philosopher, I often dance when I read these lines from his classic "Tao Te Ching." Just look into the profundity of thought in the classic where Lao-tzu clearly conceives principle of perpetual motion working in cosmos:

IV
The way is empty, yet use will not drain it.
V
It is empty without being exhausted. The more it works the more comes out.
Much speech leads inevitably to silence. Better to hold fast to void.
X LII
The way (Tao) begets one, one begets two, two begets three; three begets the myriad creatures. 

Though Lao-tzu clearly conceives principle of perpetual motion in universe, the import of his whole philosophy is about spiritual uplift of man and this is why he is generally mentioned in connection with mysticism and not with perpetual motion.

Similarly, calling to the attention of his disciples, German Philosopher Echhart says: “Now listen, I am going to say something I have said never before, when God created the heavens, the earth, and creatures, he did no work, he had nothing to do, he made no effort".

If by chance some physicist were there in the audience attending Echhart's sermon, certainly, he would have perplexed and perspired as truth revealed by mystic exposes the hollowness of concept of "work" established by the physicist in contradiction with our common sense concept of "work." I mean laws and concepts of physics are severely flawed when applied to "ultimate reality".  

All these great mystics have taught that on spiritual plane, Self reverence, Self knowledge, and Self control- these three alone leads to Self realization that eventually imparts to individual sovereign power and happiness in his life. No one will dispute the fact that their spiritualistic doctrines, from which spring eternally a perpetual progress in Wisdom and Virtue, consequently, leads to Perfection and Joy of our inner nature. But, on material plane, perpetual Motion, Self- propelled, Self regulated and Self controlled, that generates unlimited power out of nothing to fulfill demands of power in nature, have been realized by inventors only.  

Nature bestows its secrets to man only after he has struggled through a long way in the search. By practice of perpetual motion a great truth is revealed to man that energy is created from nothing and from here he infers that entire universe has sprung from nothing, then, man becomes introvert; begins to speculate upon the inner world of the changeless. In his further meditations, man's concentration is now shifted from perception and reasoning to the eternal realm of sweetness and light. This experimental approach towards understanding the ultimate nature of energy and the universe is parallel to mysticism or spiritualism, which are essentially spiritual sciences. In the cultural history of the world, we find man's consciousness oscillating between these two extremes: science and mysticism. Now the time has come to synthesize both the points of view. The perpetual motion can bridge the gap between the two and present the whole unified vision of the universe. Perpetual motion harmonizes with the ultimate conclusions of eastern mysticism. As truth is the goal of all science and philosophy, so the same truth is the goal of perpetual motion. Modern science has discovered nothing that accommodates the conclusions of the perpetual motion philosophy. Perpetual motion is a technology, philosophy and a religion at the same time. Deva Ramananda says: ‘perpetual motion is a true practical philosophy that begins with experiments and ends in meditations on true nature of energy in the ultimate realm of mysticism, it is the most sublime of all philosophies, and the most comforting of all religions. It has room for almost every religion. It embraces them all.” 

The study of perpetual motion is a most rewarding interest that can shed truth-revealing light on all aspects of existence. It can provide subject matter for a lifetime of discovery in such diverse subjects as sociology, theology, psychology, health, occult anatomy, cosmology, and metaphysics.Because it is so ancient, through perpetual motion, one can trace the development of the human mind in its struggles to understand the mystery of natural forces and exploit them to adapt to environment. Perpetual motion contains the antidote to the challenges and errors of modern life and can resolve the conflicts produced by the materialism, specifically by the Descartian/Newtonian ideas of Western philosophy and the putative laws of thermodynamics. Deva Ramananda says that perpetual motion has been the consolation of his life and would be the consolation of his death. Perpetual motion has influenced such eminent people as Brahamgupta, Bhaskarachrya, Raja Bhoja, Lao Tzu,Blavatsky, inventors like Cornelius Drebbel, Edward Somerset, Orffyreus; European or western scientists such as Leibniz, Tesla;George Stephenson, Bernoulli, Sir Richard Arkwright, inventor of the spinning Jenny; Professor s'Gravesande, Sir David Brewster and many others.They were talented persons, qualified and respected scientist, mechanics and engineer who firmly believed in possibility of perpetual motion as means of providing power to drive all types of machine. We have great appreciations for all of these great perpetual motion philosophers and inventors of the past who devoted their lives in pursuit of Truth and Wisdom. 

Does perpetual motion shatter foundations of science? Deva Ramananda says "yes" but he also shows that everything could be restored again to a wonderful simplicity by a slight change in some of fundamental concepts in physics. Every great invention has exercised its influence on the general history of science, and, in return, every important movement in science has affected the development of other branches of knowledge. Thus, the revived interest in perpetual motion and mechanical science, and the great progress made in these branches of knowledge will be characteristic of 21st century, more than anything else will determine the future of mankind.  

Above quotes and excerpts taken from the author’s EEC series of books, Volume 4: The Journey of Man: From Understanding of Motion to Perpetual Motion, Basic Fundamentals of Perpetual Motion 

Yet Another Case of Suppression, Ridicule and Mockery

Though perpetual motion and its hundreds of inventors have been ridiculed for centuries, we have frequent cases of suppression, ridicule, excommunication in other fields also. It was only after many years of fighting a battle against scientific orthodoxy, mockery and ridicules that Israeli scientist Dan Shechtman was finally awarded the Nobel Prize in chemistry on Wednesday, :5 October, 2011 for an outstanding discovery of a new crystalline chemical structure that seemed to violate the laws of nature, more or less, like our gravity driven perpetual motion machine that shatters putative law of conservation of energy. Dan Shechtman was exiled from his U.S. research team, before it won widespread acceptance as a fundamental breakthrough.  

It appears that scientific community has yet not taken any lesson, and suppression of maverick still continues though in the end he is proven right as usual. Its a oft-repeated story in the history of science.
Let me recall here the song composed by Ira Gershwin (1896-1983) “They All Laughed” (1937 song)

They all laughed at Christopher Columbus
When he said world was round.
They laughed when Edison Recorded sound.
They all laughed at Wilbur and his brother when they said that man could fly
They told Marconi Wirless was phony.
It’s the same old cry!

"People just laughed at me," Shechtman recalled in an interview this year with Israeli newspaper Haaretz, noting how Linus Pauling, giant of chemical sciences and double Nobel laureate, debunked his rare work and launched a "crusade" against him, with remarks: "There is no such thing as quasicrystals, only quasi-scientists."  

After scolding Shechtman to go back and better read the textbook, the head of his research group asked him to leave for "bringing disgrace" on the team. "I felt rejected," Shechtman recollected.  

"His discovery was extremely controversial," remarked the Nobel Committee at the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, which granted him the $1.5-million award.

Committee further added "Dan Shechtman had to fight a fierce battle against established science ... His battle eventually forced scientists to reconsider their conception of the very nature of matter."  

"In quasicrystals, we find the fascinating mosaics of the Arabic world reproduced at the level of atoms: regular patterns that never repeat themselves."

Does scientist get any lesson from this story?

"A good scientist is a humble and listening scientist and not one that is sure 100 percent in what he reads in the textbooks," Shechtman himself said.

I would further add to this lesson that scientists must cease to ridicule perpetual motion and its inventor. They must review their errors and re-investigate the entire thermodynamics. If they do not do this, perpetual motion is surely going to boomerang on them in near future.

Look at the Dan Shechtman’s model in above picture.  

A point to ponder!

Whether be it structure of DNA (Watson and Crick double helical strand model) or structure of Dan Shechtman’s model in above picture or crossbar in a gravity perpetual motion machine, the Lazy tong structure appears to be an important component.  

It appears that mystery of the “Brahamanda- the expanding Egg” (universe) as Vedic Rhisis called it, subject to expansion and contraction, is yet not over. Also, Australian Academy of Science Professor Brian Schmidt is one of three US-born scientists to win the Nobel Prize in Physics this year for discovering that the universe is expanding at an accelerating pace.

Reference:Above quotes taken from the news article "Ridiculed crystal work wins Nobel for Israeli"
By Patrick Lannin and Veronica Ek STOCKHOLM | Thu Oct 6, 2011 10:12am EDT, Reuters, EDITION:U.S  

Fri, October 21, 2011
India Today Reports

Indian physicist 'cheated' of Nobel?

This year's Nobel Prize in physics went to three astronomers for their work demonstrating that "dark energy" was propelling expansion of the universe at ever-increasing speeds. An Indian physicist claims that he had proposed a similar theory a year before the three astronomers first announced their results in 1998.

Dr B. G. Sidharth, director general of B. M. Birla Science Centre, had proposed the "dark energy" model at the seventh Marcel Grossman Conference in Jerusalem in June 1997, and at another conference on quantum physics in Singapore a year later. His research paper titled "The Universe of Fluctuations" was published in International Journal of Modern Physics in 1998.

Astronomers, including Saul Perlmutter and Adam Reiss - two of the three winners of the 2011 Nobel - published their observations, which confirmed Sidharth's theory. Their studies were published in the Astrophysics Journal in 1999.

B.M. Birla Science Centre

Sidharth asserts that it was only after his paper was published that the other researchers got their findings published. "My theory was based on physics and mathematical calculations. The mathematical model that I followed is called fluctuational cosmology. On the other hand, the model proposed by the Nobel winners was based on observational findings while studying a supernova," he said.

According to his model, there was no big bang resulting in the creation of matter and energy in the universe instantaneously. Rather the universe is permeated by an energy field or quantum vacuum. Out of such an all- pervading energy field, particles are created in a totally random manner, a process that continues. "This model was diametrically opposite to the accepted idea that the universe, dominated by dark matter, was actually decelerating. However, I proposed that driven by dark energy, the universe would be expanding and accelerating," he said.

Sidharth recalls that his theory was written off by physicists since it had several inexplicable concepts. "Several astronomers in 1998 confided to me that my observations were wrong. What is surprising is that when the three astronomers also proposed the same theory based on observational findings, it was also rejected."

He said the presence of dark energy was later confirmed by the Wilkinson Microwave Probe (WMAP) and the Sloane Digital Sky Survey. He claims that his research papers had received several critical reviews.

Though Sidharth had presented his papers at the Jerusalem conference and got them published in the international journals, they went unnoticed by the subsequent researchers, including the three Nobel prize winners.

Sidharth feels that the Nobel academy should have acknowledged his contribution, but does not plan to take up the issue with it. However, he said, several of his scientist friends are planning to write to the Academy. "I am happy that my findings have been reconfirmed, though I did not expect that the theory would fetch the Nobel prize," he signs off. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________

LET US DEVELOP A COSMOLOGY BASED ON PERPETUAL MOTION

Let me comment here. One thing is certain that all of these physicists have no desire to revisit idea of perpetual motion which their predecessors had buried since law of conservation of energy was established
Theories in cosmology on the origin of Universe are numerous and of great variety. We must not be surprised to see that each one of them have limitations. If any one of them was satisfactory, we should not get any new one. And there is a mad rush to invent new theories in this field. If each new philosopher or scientist who has applied himself to the question has thought it necessary to invent another; it is because he was dissatisfied with those of his predecessors; and if he was not satisfied, it was because he thought he detected a petitio principii.These theories do not offer any satisfactory answer to the problem of creation of matter and they also do not take cognizance of a vital principle like perpetual motion or Prana, a self-principle that moves by itself.

Perpetual motion by demonstrating continuous creation of energy can solve most pressing problems of cosmology. Sooner or later, the physicist has to come to realize this point though his terms and approach may be different. Now we have entered in 21st century. Much has been written in last century about perpetual motion as the hoax, folly, and fraud. During the last hundred years or so and particularly during the last century, human knowledge has developed to astonishing degrees. With increasing knowledge have come improved techniques, and a large number of inventions. But unfortunately science has entirely closed the door for perpetual motion.

Perpetual motion is a continual process of getting an endless mechanical advantage to perform work by creativity and ingenuity. Invention of the gravity motor is just a beginning. Scope of the perpetual motion is unlimited. If the human beings keep on evolving, it would probably end, at the point, where one becomes equivalent to the powers of nature or god. Deva Ramananda observes perpetual motion as gradual process of sharing with glory of god and his powers. This is one of the starting points where technology and religion meet. Perpetual motionist will finally become God when he would create not only energy from nothing but every thing that he desires at the command of his ‘Will’. Moreover, when perpetual motionist would do it, he would have already become a God. This is why Rbhus, Vedic perpetual motionist enjoyed status of being equivalent to God. By practice of mechanical arts, when they achieved divinity and immortality, they were offered Soma drink by the gods. There are many hymns sung in praise of them. Unfortunately, today glory has gone and perpetual motionist is ridiculed everywhere, he is considered as crackpot.

Perpetual motion is very much forgotten and abandoned subject in scientific circles at present times. Undoubtedly, perpetual motion is an old art. It thrived well in 16 –17-18 centuries. However, it is still being practiced by free energy enthusiasts in present time. You can find beginning of mechanics in perpetual motion. While going through history of perpetual motion, you must have felt a time reversal- going back into the past. This throw back must have upset you a little. But, we are helpless. We do not know why perpetual motion upsets everything- at some stage it upsets even its inventor, investor, examiner, and so on. Since perpetual motion is a fundamental problem that has gone unattended by science ever since law of conservation of energy was established, this throwback is bound to upset science. Sometimes throw back is inevitable, particularly, when old and new knowledge compliment with each other to reveal truth greater than before. While formulating his general theory of relativity, Einstein had to revisit Vortex theory of Descartes that paved way for visualization of space-time curvature.

If you have a progressive mind, you will acknowledge that rediscovery and crucial experiment of perpetual motion can open up new vistas before us and correct some of the mistakes that science committed in past. We can judge the embarrassment of physicists because perpetual motion, which was buried down by them some 150 years ago, has come to life again. While going through these pages, your creative and researching mind is sure to reach to the point to which even quantum mechanics and relativity have not come parallel. The truth of perpetual motion shows indicates to the ultimate reality, the source of everything about which physicists yet requires much to learn. Experience has convinced us that whenever a major new experiment arrives, new domains of knowledge are created. It makes a shift in our attitude, as new facts of entirely different character from those of former experience are revealed and gradually we prepare ourselves to adapt to new situation.

Advent of quantum mechanics and the theory of relativity have brought a profound change in the thinking man to a great extent and now there is growing conviction that in reality new orders of experience do exist; and with discovery of perpetual motion and every major break through in the future, we may expect to meet them continually. Perpetual motion promises to impart a better future in both ways –theoretical as well as practical. I hope readers will find something in it, which evokes his curiosity to undertake further studies of this fascinating subject.

To realize the profundity of the philosophy contained in perpetual motion, we have to keep query and ask questions- While gravity perpetual motion machine works, where does energy come from? Does it come from gravity or somewhere else? Where does the gravity come from?

I can presume to raise the questions and ask you to think about them, in the hope that if enough people think about that, we may some day get them answered. If we are here diving into a realm of thought, that has more of metaphysics than physics in it, never mind, all-modern theories of physics are, more or less, are bound to have room for meta-physical interpretations on account of imperfect nature of concepts of physic or a state of crisis. And I am sure no wise physicist will venture to throw metaphysics in to fire for he understands that his own subject will smolder also- that not only philosophy but also mathematics- queen of the science contains indecisive propositions. Godel’s theorem has enough to say about that.

Where Does Created Energy Come From?

One can answer that it is the kinetic energy, which comes from the motion of the various parts of the machine mainly the planets, which exerts pressure to move the wheel because of the gravity pull. But then arises the question: Where does the gravity come from? It comes from the mass of the matter- in this case mass of the planets and earth and because of the interaction between them. Where does mass come from? It comes from energy as Einstein tells us that energy has mass and mass has energy. Where does the energy come from? So we have again come to our original question. Whenever we attempt to answer any thing, which is ultimate, our answers are bound to form a vicious close cycle. So Where Does The Energy Come From? Energy does not come from anywhere; it simply appears. Simply, it is created out of ‘nothing’. Energy is just appearance. I hope readers will find something in it, which evokes his curiosity to undertake further studies of Over-balancing wheel. Energy which is claimed to be measured by scientist is appearance only. Since everything is made of energy, they are also appearance. Vedanta tells us that Maya consisting of the phenomenal world in which every thing – bud or flower, table or chair, pebble or rock, pleasure or pain -have their relative existence are mere appearances. They are different forms; they are nothing in themselves.

Ultimate Questions Are Not Answerable

Osho Rajneesh tells us that those questions which are simple often belong to category of the ultimate questions. You may raise any simple question from any branch of the knowledge and try to find the answer yourself, also try to see what others have said. You will see that there is no absolute answer to simple things that pose ultimate questions. To clarify this point, Osho Rajneesh enlightens us with many illustrations from history.

Let us raise a simple question from the mathematics – the queen of the science. We all know that two plus two is four but Bertrand Russell, one of the greatest mathematicians of our age in his book philosophy of mathematics discusses the problem in detail and ultimately fails to conclude that two plus two is four. We all know that two plus two is four, we have heard people saying it that two plus two is four. It is a simple question but a philosopher like Bertrand Russell would like to know and indulge in the simple question to know the truth. And his logical argumentation takes him to write two hundred and fifty pages to go into this simple question whether two plus two is four. Finally, Bertrand Russell concludes that it is only a belief that two plus two is four. Nothing can be said with certainty. It is a utilitarian concept and is only true as long as it works. To settle the problem, Godel, another mathematician goes even deeper than Russel has gone and rejects his conclusion. Godel is also a rare genius. Godel says that there is no possibility of two plus two being four. He rejects all the possibilities. His argument is simple and clear, even Bertrand Russell failed to refute it. Godel’s argument runs in this fashion: We can put two chairs and two chairs together and naturally, they are four chairs. But two in itself is an abstract symbol and does not truly represent two chairs.

In this vast Universe, no two things are exactly same. No two-finger prints are exactly same. No two forces are exactly same. We cannot find two people exactly same. We cannot find two leaves exactly same in the whole forest. Then how can two leaves that are not equal, together with two other leaves, which are also not equal, be four? The same is true with tables, chairs, and any thing that two plus two is not equal to four. Godel’s argument is appealing and equally powerful to settle the basic question on the basis that no two things in existence are exactly similar. This makes existence more mysterious. Mystery can be realized and lived but cannot be known. It always remains a mystery. Energy is a mystery. Its creation from nothing is a mystery.

We have so many ultimate questions. People have asked them to great masters who were enlightened people in their field. If anyone has attempted to answer a ultimate question- I think he could not succeed and whosoever claims to answer the question lives under an illusion.

This is why Lord Buddha denied answering 10 questions, which are called ‘Avyaktani’ because he considered it useless to search for the solutions, he never tried for the solution.

1. Is the world eternal?
2. Is it non-eternal?
3. Is it finite?
4. Is it infinite?
5. Is the body and self the same?
6. Is the self different from the body?
7. Was the Tathagat reborn after death?
8. Was he not born after death?
9. Is there re-birth and also no re-birth?
10. Is the rebirth and no re-birth both false.

From the practical standpoint, the answers to these questions are useless and from philosophical standpoint, no final solution can be secured. Hence, Buddha has not discussed them. This is not the case with only Buddha. This is the case with Mahaveera, Lautzu, Jesus and Moses.- with every one without exception. And these are great masters, sensible and intelligent persons. However, few have pretended to answer them. They have utterly failed. For centuries, these kinds of answers have put people in illusion. However, what great masters cannot answer, there is a possibility that an innocent child will answer because he is not an authority, he does not care for the respectability. He can risk everything for his sincerity. He is not going to bother if the whole world is going to ridicule him.

Osho Rajneesh reminds us that these men who were not prepared to put their wisdom at stake, could not show courage to admit –‘ I don’t know’. But that is the only authenticable and the most sincere answer because that gives a sense that we care to ultimate: now begins the mystery and it is unsolvable. There is no way to reduce it into knowledge. It is not an unknown, which can be made known by a rigorous exercise, effort, and intelligence or by any discipline, any method or by any ritual. Perpetual motionist does not care to define things because it is always a futile exercise.

Osho Rajneesh gives one more example. G.E. Moore, one of the greatest genius, who wrote ‘Pricipia Ethica’ found himself in a big trouble when he set himself to define ‘good’. Because ‘good’ forms the basic of the ethics and without defining ‘good’ and ‘bad’, there can be no ethics and no morality. What is good? It was a fundamental question and without realizing that it is the ultimate question, he found himself in troubled waters. G.E.Moore tried to look ‘good’ from different view points enquiring for more than two hundred pages, just on a single and simple question- What is ‘good’? How to define it and what is the most correct answer? Finally, he was defeated. He applied concentrated thinking, the keenest logic, and rational analysis but nothing could help him. He became so frustrated that he said, ‘don’t blame me that I have not been able to define what is good? Even simple questions- this is a very complex question- are indefinable.’

Cro-ce has faced same difficulty in defining ‘beauty’. His work is also voluminous ,a thousand pages and after this great exercise he has come to conclusion that ‘beauty’ is indefinable.

So every thing is indefinable because every thing in its essence is mysterious. It is not only a question of ‘beauty’ or good or bad. Mass, energy, work, motion, force, whole, absolute, space and time- whole existence consists of indefinables. To recognize this fact is to recognize our ultimate ignorance. And to be able to recognize our ultimate ignorance, we need a selfless ego and innocence of a child but that has been missing.

Only a man like Bodhidharma, a man of tremendous wisdom, courage, and intelligence has the courage to say that there is no answer to the question. He says – “I do not know”. Bodhidharma was facing an ultimate question, which nobody has ever been able to reply.. The ultimate question is ultimate because it cannot be answered. All philosophy, theology, and mysticism eventually come to the ultimate question, and there is no answer to it. Hoyle, in his “Steady State Theory” states that matter is in constant state of creation. But where does it come from? While answering this question, he says –”it simply appears”. He has no other satisfactory answer to the question. Because the question “Where does the matter come from?” - is an ultimate question.

He could have simply said I do not know, but to say, I do not know needs the greatest courage in the world. Hoyle does not seem to have that courage. So if you wish to know the source of energy which perpetual motion machines creates or if you want to know where energy come from, my first initial answer is that I don't know and I do not want to try to pretend by advancing some scientific mumbo jumbo. I do not want to build up any equation, law, theory, hypotheses, or postulate, to create an illusion that I know the answer. However, an attempt should be made to know the answer, after all, to find an answer to this question will not be bad thing so that intellectual curiosity is satisfied to some extent but whatever rigorous intellectual exercise we do in an attempt to answer an ultimate question, mystery is further heightened. There is no end to it. Knowledge of ultimate becomes more unknowable and ultimate question remains ultimate. This is the whole reason why we call the essential religion – mysticism. If everything can be answered, then, there is no question of any mystery and when there is no mystery, all beauty is lost.

I shall repeat the question. Where does energy come from? We are interested in knowing the ultimate source. If we can know the answer of this question then we will get key where from the existence has come? Existence is a mystery because we can go on answering, but finally we come to ultimate question, which is unanswerable. Moreover, it is not far away, with two or three more questions it soon comes. We can answer all superficial things, but as we go deeper the ultimate questions come closer and the moment the ultimate question come every one is cornered.

Just ask the cosmologist, where the entire Universe has come from?. He may answer; it came from a primeval atom. He will explain you the Big Bang theory. Now, the ultimate question-who created this primeval atom or a big bang? What was there before primeval atom existed? Question has a indefinite regress. Like wise religion that believes in God may continue their answer up to the point where it is asked-who has created this beautiful Universe? Where the existence has come from? They will answer, God was the creator, and he created every thing. Now arises the ultimate question- who created the God? Or as some body asked Saint Augustine: What was God doing before he created this world? And what was the answer, he could not answer; even nobody can answer. In embarrassment, he replied: “God was busy in preparing a hell for those who ask such questions.”!

Religion and theosophy answer that it was divine power that gave origin to everything in the Universe, a beginning that has no end. This age old answer pretends to clarify everything but in reality it makes no point and clarifies nothing. Our thought has the audacity to ask: Who created God? God created himself will be the most probable answer as our faith in God is fully concerned without a need of a previous being. There are no valid answers if we are not liberated of the concept of time and space in the sense of a controllable, convenient and subjective measure. If we could liberate ourselves from them, new horizons can open before our thought.

To any theory of origin of Universe is inevitable opposed, like a phantom, the question: And before, what was there? Further, then, what is there?

Similarly, for energy physicist is always inclined to know about its source. This is because of his conditioning of mind, his training in which he has been taught that energy must be in something, it must have a source. Without some source, it cannot come out. And wherever it comes out it is always in accordance with law of conservation of energy.

Nevertheless, enquiry is not wrong, not at all illogical because if everything needs some creator, then got must need a creator. And if God needs no creator, then why bother about God? Then why cannot we accept an existence itself, without a creator. If we have to accept somewhere or other, then it is better to stop with existence as the ultimate, because at least we know it, we are part of it. If we do not accept self-existence of some thing, indefinite regress goes on. We have to accept a self-existent principle somewhere to end the indefinite regress. This is the big problem of philosophy which one has to face somewhere.

Perpetual motion is one of the most significant inventions of the nature. This simple fact can be discovered in the two extremes, in the infinitely great as well as in the infinitely small.

Universe without perpetual motion cannot maintain itself and evolve. By perpetual motion, it creates energy and sustains its structure and form. Contrary to the first law of thermodynamics and all the experiments so far demonstrated in the favor of the principle, nature of energy is more accurately demonstrated through working of perpetual motion machines. By studying perpetual motion, one can discover laws of energy, which are more reasonable. In the light of perpetual motion, science and philosophy are under the necessity to seek new concepts for the interpretation of energy and cast their old kingdom into another mould.

Perpetual motion makes everything unified; every thing is linked together. Every thing is explained by perpetual motion which explains something else and that in its turn explains another. Perpetual motion interconnects every thing into a whole, there is nothing separate because every thing has to balance against each other, and every thing has to play its own role in coordinating the motion as a part of the great whole. There is nothing separate; that is, nothing that can be named or described separately. Nothing out side. Every thing is interrelated, interdependent and in a state of perpetual motion which forms a basis for all change and transformation in the Universe. Through perpetual motion, we are in the closest, most vital and intimate relationship with the entire cosmos.

Logic and intellect are only the parts of man’s being and not the whole being. The realization of the whole is a unique experience for it implies the freedom of consciousness from the polarities of knowledge, and all kinds of psychic mutations. Evolution is a purposeful organic perpetual motion by which, in living -beings new potentialities are created out of nothing. When self- motion is possible and understandable, there is no much difficulty in explaining self- repairing and self- reproducing which are characteristics of the living –beings. When radiation falls on matter, it may be partly reflected, partly absorbed, and partly transmitted. It has three possibilities. In the same way, it is logical to think that energy in its innumerable interactions and transformations may be created, conserved, and destroyed.

One question arises: Does transformation of one form of energy into other require expenditure of energy? Transformation of energy and never the creation is the word of science today. The fact is that creation of energy is the basic principles on which nature works; it is after that the question of conservation arises. By recognizing the truth of perpetual motion, science is bound to come to this conclusion in a short time. Perpetual motion is a crucial experiment. Perpetual motion is the most direct and demonstrative evidence that energy is creatable.

Some perpetual motionist has amusingly remarked: “Energy is not a mouse, running around, going into one hole, and coming out of another.”

God Has No Role As A Storekeeper Who Has To Remain Busy With Maintaining The Accounts Of Energy

Why to speculate that energy was already stored, and as our universe moves on, it would get exhaust someday. Perpetual motion is there to compensate. Universe is not just a store attended by God in the role of a storekeeper who has to remain busy with maintaining the accounts of energy. Let him relax. It would be too much taxing for him to guard twenty-four hours the fact that fix amount of matter remains in his store; it will be a too much strain to him watch that not a single atom is added to his store.

Adherents of second law of the first law of thermodynamics say that Universe is running down. One day all available energy will be exhausted and there will be the heat death of the Universe. The idea is ridiculous from perpetual motion point of view. Universe is a dynamic and self-sustained system in which demands of energy are fulfilled by perpetual motion by which energy is created out of nothing.
Perpetual motion is existence. A photon keeps moving forever. A photon is never at rest, it is always moving at 186000 miles a second. Therefore, its motion is its existence. If motion is halted, it will vanish into nothingness.

Energy is existence. It is subtle essence and substratum of all the things in the Universe. World has beginning in it, end in it. Various forms of energy are manifestations of this energy. Quantity of motion can increase and decrease therefore kinetic energy of Universe is subject to increase and decrease. Man which is a insignificant point in the Universe will never be able to know the Universe in its totality. We are only living in a little corner of the Universe. By making long excursions in space which future research in perpetual motion will enable us to do, we may find law of conservation of energy completely upset at colossal level. We have been fortunate enough to be born in a world, which is self sufficient in matter, energy, and motion. Many astronomical facts support the idea that energy is created out of nothing. Perpetual motion machine is like space –time singularity of a black hole- a place where physical laws, as presently understood, cease to apply.

In our civilization, truth of the most beautiful thoughts has been doubted. Nature does nothing which man who is embedded in nature cannot achieve. Energy can be created, if you know how to create it out of nothingness. All creativity of energy is creation – Universe, but physicist says, energy is uncreatable. Laws of physics are like comics; they seldom have reality. We are sure that we create. What are we? We are nothing, just “ego” only. If you can annihilate your ego, lose your identity, you can become one with the universal energy. This is energy actualization.

Man is a puny object in the world, as trifling as a straw or dust. World is unknowable in a true sense, yet, by a curious paradox, in its comprehension man goes beyond and includes the whole world within which he lives. Man plays his drama in the world; he goes on creating religion, science philosophy, and arts within the world and yet contains the world in his thoughts. He is integral part of nature and most of the time without transcending his consciousness he invents theories, inventions and laws to explain the whole nature. We do not know where we are. Who we are? And where do we stand? But physicist pretends as if he knows the whole universe.

No theory, no law, no concept prevalent in science is able to explain perpetual motion; therefore, it is natural to look elsewhere for the explanation. Eastern mysticism is closer to perpetual motion. Now everything, which is created, must have a cause, for without cause nothing can be created. What causes perpetual motion machine to create energy? Design of the machine is formal cause, and its various parts a material cause. Perpetual motionist and his tools are the efficient cause and inventor and his purpose his will or consciousness, the final cause.

Energy Is Identical to “Prana”

Recall Nikola Tesla here! who learned few Sanskrit terms from Swami Vivekananda when he was on a US tour. It helped Tesla to build his theory.

Chhandogya Upanishad states:
Prana , verily is greater than hope, just as the spokes of chariot wheel are fixed in nave, so also is all the fixed on this prana. Prana moves by prana, and gives for prana.
Pranah pranen yati, praanh pranam dadati pranam dadati.
Prana is father, prana is mother, prana is sister,prana is the teacher, prana is the brihma.
Prana is greater than hope. What does constitute its superiority? This is being explained by means of an illustration establishing its superiority.

Just as, in the world, the spokes of a chariot are fixed i.e. set, in the nave of chariot, similarly it is in the pransa called Prjmanatma which is chief prana in the living body, and which is the aggregate of many subtle separate bodies. That the supreme deity has entered in the form of Jiva(individual soul) so as reflection in a mirror for manifesting name and form.
As is a general superintendent to a king, so is this to lord, as evidenced by the sruti-text. By whose rising shall I become risen, by whose staying, shall I be staying on? Thinking this he created prana. It follows the lord like a shadow.
Again, we read in Kaushitaki Brhama Upanishad.
Just as spokes attach the felly of the wheel and spokes are fixed in the nave of a wheel, so are fixed particular objects on particular perceptions and the particular perceptions are fixed on the prana, and this prana is certainly the conscious self. Hence, all that is said alone is fixed on prana.
Chhandogya- vii – 15-1

This prana which is not dependent on another, moves by its own power. The idea is that its skill in the movement is not derived from any other source. All that is known as action is its accessories and result in nothing but prana. The meaning of this section is that there exists nothing outside prana. Prana gives prana, what it gives is identical with itself. To whosoever it is given, that too, goes to prana. Hence, all what is called further is prana alone.


Perpetual motion and its corollaries inevitably lead us to the admission of energy as an incorporeal being – spiritual being. Perpetual motion philosophy offers an adequate and satisfactory explanation of material as well as spiritual world.

........................................................................................................................

Quoted from authors book "Infinite Energy from Nothing" EEC Series, Volume: 16

Monogram of Christ on the Labarum by Kabalist

Arrangement of four letters of the Tetragram

MAIN STORY

YOUNG ORFFYREUS